Reciprocity and Social Norms: Short- and Long-Run Crowding Out Effects of Financial Incentives

Jinhua Zhaoa, d, John M. Kerrb, Maria Knight Lapinskic, Robert Shuppd

Author information

a Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA  
b Department of Community Sustainability, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI 48824, USA  
c Department of Communication, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI 48824, USA
d Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI 48824, USA
E-mail: jz638@cornell.edu (Jinhua Zhao, corresponding author), jkerr@msu.edu (John M. Kerr), lapinsk3@msu.edu (Maria Knight Lapinski), shupprob@msu.edu (Robert Shupp)

Abstract

We link the reciprocity model of Falk and Fischbacher (2006) with the theory of normative social behavior to study how financial incentives crowd out intrinsic motivation in both the short and long runs. Using data from a lab-based repeated public goods game, we find strong evidence in support of the reciprocity model and crowding out effects both when the payment is in place and after it stops. When the payment program is in place, subjects become less sensitive to reciprocity, perceive less kindness in others’ contributions, and care less about others’ welfare. The overall decrease in motivation to reciprocate reduces the effectiveness of the payment program by almost 50%. About 20% of the crowding out effect persists after the payment stops, and the reciprocity mechanism explains over three quarters of the long-run crowding out effect.

Keywords

reciprocity, social norms, crowding out, public goods game

Cite this article

Jinhua Zhao, John M. Kerr, Maria Knight Lapinski, Robert ShuppReciprocity and Social Norms: Short- and  Long-Run Crowding Out Effects of Financial Incentives. Front. Econ. China2021, 16(2): 177–213 https://doi.org/10.54605/fec20210202


关于我们 | 联系我们 | 友情链接 | 高等研究院 | 财大首页
版权所有:上海财经大学 地址:上海市杨浦区武川路111号上海财经大学高等研究院307室 邮编:200433